Best Video Spokesperson Company (ies)
  • UPWARD TREND
  • DOWNWARD TREND
  • NO
    CHANGE

Best Video Spokesperson Company - August 2014

RANK COMPANY NAME YEAR FOUNDED REVENUE FULL TIME EMPLOYEES ACTIVE CLIENTS CLIENT RETENTION RATE PRICING CLIENTS Overall Score Composite score based on criterias and quality of work observed.
0100
GVGE
Visual AppealFirm's presentation abilities of the end product.Video FeaturesFirm's rolodex of features that are embedded within videos.Size Of Actor NetworkFirm's size of actor network that clients can choose from.IntegrationFirm's solution allows for easy integration of video to a website.Review ProcessFirm's methodology on retakes of videos if expectations are not met initially. Change in Rank Indicates shift in rank from previous month's rank.
1st Award
Website Talking Heads

Sandy, Utah Jed Knudsen 801-748-2281_ Visit Website Talking Heads File A Complaint
Commend This Vendor
2001 $250,000 - $999,000 1 - 10 3341 92% M Skin It, Chia Pets, The Bosson Group, QuoteZoom, FiberFix
100%
100 100 100 100 100 NC More Info
2nd Award
Your Website Spokesperson

Overland Park, Kansas Greg L. 800-300-1480_ Visit Your Website Spokesperson File A Complaint
Commend This Vendor
2009 $1 million - $2,999,999 11 - 25 50+ 98% M Com Linq, University Bound, ViaViente, Art Schools Online, Smart Shopper
99.6%
100 99 100 100 99 NC More Info
3rd Award
Website Actor Live

Scottsdale, Arizona Michael W (480) 968-6151_ Visit Website Actor Live File A Complaint
Commend This Vendor
2006 $1 million - $2,999,999 51 - 100 350 95% M Confidential
98.8%
98 99 100 98 99 - More Info
4
Innovate Ads

Costa Mesa, California John Cecil 949-929-1324_ Visit Innovate Ads File A Complaint
Commend This Vendor
2006 $1 million - $2,999,999 26 - 50 60 96% M Capitol Records, First Premier Bank, Acne Recovery, Canon Cyber Scholar, We Speak Insurance
98.4%
100 99 96 97 100 +1 More Info
5
iSpeakVideo

Seattle, Washington Stan Bloch 855-547-7325_ Visit iSpeakVideo File A Complaint
Commend This Vendor
2003 $1 million - $2,999,999 26 - 50 2000+ 95% M Citrix, PetMeds, TaxACT, Microsoft, Sodexo
98.2%
100 98 99 98 96 -2 More Info
6
Laser Stream Video

Marietta, Georgia Mike Parsons 877-974-8364_ Visit Laser Stream Video File A Complaint
Commend This Vendor
2006 $250,000 - $999,000 1 - 10 1382 91% M Saggezza, Tanzanite, Hertz, DCH Auto Group, Dish Network
97.6%
96 98 96 100 98 +1 More Info
7
Original Video Productions

Coral Springs, Florida Eric Lightman 888-345-8433_ Visit Original Video Productions File A Complaint
Commend This Vendor
1990 $3 million - $4,999,999 51 - 100 89 90% L Pandora Beads, Maid To Perfection, Hooters
97.2%
97 98 97 98 96 +2 More Info
8
VSP Worldwide Productions

Coconut Creek, Florida Rohan Williams (480) 624-2599 _ Visit VSP Worldwide Productions File A Complaint
Commend This Vendor
2007 $250,000 - $999,000 26 - 50 87 95% H You-Tube Presentations, Personalized Video Email, Video Banner Ads, Website Video Header, Website Video Overlay
96.6%
99 96 95 96 97 - More Info

Evaluation Criteria - How We Identify The Best Video Spokesperson Company (ies) in US

topseos.com, the independent authority on search vendors, recognizes the best virtual spokesperson vendors in the industry.  Vendors that are listed by us have gone through a meticulous evaluation process to determine their quality of work. This often includes the review of the company portfolio and contacting clients in order to obtain evaluations.  At the end of this process, the top companies are ranked.

topseos has identified five key areas that are important when it comes to choosing the best virtual spokesperson company. These key areas are: visual appeal, video features, size of actor network, integration, and review process.

The visual appeal of the videos is the first aspect evaluated.  Compared to other vendors, what is the overall quality of the provided videos?  Are the videos grainy or jumpy?  If green screen technology was used, how effectively was it implemented?

Next we review the video features offered by the vendor.  How does the video appear on the site? What sort of control does the user have over the video?

Another important factor is the size of the actor network.  Does the vendor offer various actors in order to give many different options of actors in order for you to pick actors that fit your site?  Does the vendor even have actors or actresses available or do they only shoot the video and you have to provide an actor?

Integration of the videos into the site is a large part of the whole process, and is an important aspect of our evaluation.  How much support does the company offer when it comes to integration?

Lastly we assess the review process of the vendor.  If a client is not happy with the work, how does the virtual spokesperson company work to resolve the matter? How are retakes handled? How can the client ensure that the work will be completed properly?

General Queries

  • What type of needs analysis was conducted before work initiated?
  • What type of a ROI were you anticipating, what was achieved and in what time frame?
  • What would be 3 things you would change about your experience?
  • What was your total investment?
  • Rate your overall experience (1-10; 10 being the highest).

 

Project Specific Queries :

  • How quickly was the shoot scheduled after a script was developed?
  • What level of details did the agency go into with you on attire, tone, personality required of the virtual spokesperson before shooting?
  • How open was the firm to modifications to the shoot after it was shot?
  • Were animation components (flash) added to the shoot; how creative was the firm in generating ideas on their own?
  • Did the implementation of the virtual spokesperson result in an increase of conversions? By how much?